Aram justifies the act of stealing the horse to himself by deciding that taking a horse in order to go for a ride on it is not at all the same as stealing other, tangible things, “such as money.” Having identified this as a mental justification, Aram goes further, questioning whether stealing a horse is really stealing …
How did Aram convince himself to ride the stolen horse?
He had only taken the horse without informing the owner. If they would have sold this horse for money then it would have been stealing. Aram gets convinced on this and believes that they would return the horse and have taken it only for some time.
How did Aram define stealing when he had to decide whether or not to steal the horse?
How did little Aram define stealing when he had to decide whether or not to ride the horse? Answer: … When he guessed that Mourad had stolen the horse, he defined that stealing a horse for a ride was not like stealing money. It would become stealing if he and Mourad wanted to sell the horse.
How does Aram justify the act of stealing?
Stealing is unheard of in their clan. When Mourad arrives with the horse in the middle of night, Aram is forced to justify how the animal came to be in his possession. … If they decided to sell it, which would never enter their minds, then the line would be crossed, and the animal would be considered stolen goods.
Can stealing be justified for any reason discuss Aram and Mourad’s stealing of a horse in the light of this statement?
Aram and his cousin Mourad justifies that stealing of a horse isn’t really stealing as like stealing of money. It could be considered as stealing, only if he and Mourad has the intention to make money out of it by selling the horse.
What arguments did Aram give to prove that Mourad’s stealing John Byro’s horse wasn’t stealing?
Ans. Aram too was very crazy about horse riding. But riding a stolen horse both delighted and frightened him. He justified Mourad’s action saying that taking out a horse just for a joy-ride could not be called stealing until they offered to sell it.
Why did the narrator justify Mourad’s act of stealing a horse to himself?
Narrator justified this stealing because he believed that it was not a stealing because Mourad didn’t steal the horse for money purpose, he stole the horse for riding and have fun as Mourad was very fond of horse riding and he didn’t have money to buy a horse.
Why did Aram find it hard to believe that it had stolen the horse?
Aram found it hard to believe because the tribe that both Aram and Mourad belonged to was known for their honesty. No member of their tribe could think of taking undue advantage of anyone; stealing was considered despicable among them. For this reason, Aram could not believe Mourad could have stolen the horse.
How Aram describe the horse?
Aram describes his horse Magnificent and Beautiful White horse .
What is the moral lesson you learn from Aram and Mourad’s act of returning the stolen horse?
In William Saroyan’s “The Summer of the Beautiful White Horse,” one could interpret the moral of the story as something to the effect of “no harm, no foul.” Even though Aram and Mourad steal Johnny Byro’s horse, no harm comes to either Johnny Byro or the animal.
How did Aram console himself that stealing the horse was different from stealing other things?
in aram’s mind when mourad took horse, he had no intension of selling it to make profit and therefore his a tion can’t be described as theft. as such, he did not need to justify what has happened because he does not believe that his cousin mourad had broken the law. hope it helped.!
Can the act of stealing be ever justified give your views in the context of reading the summer of the beautiful white horse?
The act of stealing can never be justified according to the story the summer of the beautiful horse. Explanation: however there is a certain condition in which a person is compelled to still certain things from other. One of the thing is the beauty and the wealth.